beans motherfucker

Weirdness from a weird girl (Whom you may or may not love, it's not up to me dude. Whatever floats your boat.)

1,317 notes

hiddleslady asked: You do realize that Frozen is set in Norway during a time period where the amount of POC were able to be counted all on 1 hand in comparison to the entire region correct? Expecting historical accuracy and tossing in a random POC for political correctness is fucking stupid.

sun-thief-rai:

blackfangirlsunite:

Actually Frozen takes place in a fucking fairy tale kingdom with talking snow men. It’s based on Norway but why can’t it have POC? 

How is it politically correct to have black people ina magical kingdom? And it doesn’t have to be random because in a world where snow men talk and hearts are frozen and cities are enchanted, you can make it so that black people were there.

Just admit that you want more all white movies for the sake of them being all white when they really don’t have to be.

Just admit it and leave 

Isn’t it interesting though!?

When we sit and watch, read, or listen to ANYTHING fiction we do not question that world’s canon.

You lose your sense of reality because you WANT to believe the story you’re being told.

That is why we can easily accept talking inanimate toys, a world of witchcraft and wizardry, and even two brothers going against the supernatural.

But as SOON as someone that is brown, identifies as a woman, is queer, shapely, disabled, etc. you all of a sudden can’t believe it!

Your fantasy crumbles at your feet when others that are only asking to be represented and included in this fantastical world as well want to experience it too. You suddenly bring out how it’s not “historically accurate” or that “it doesn’t make sense” to include more real people that physically share the same world as you for such and such basic-mindless reasons.

But you do not question the magic.

You do not question the hooded figures in the dog park.

You do not argue the impossibility of a talking snowman and a dog-like moose.

You easily accept all of those things and more but you’d be damned if a brown, disabled, and/or queer, woman/dude is included in the story as well.

Then it’s just being “politically correct”.

You’re a backwards human being and you need to take a second look on your life.

  1. it-s-zen-ish reblogged this from colurz-changed-ulrs-again
  2. grapegoat reblogged this from caramelcheese
  3. caramelcheese reblogged this from jhenne-bean
  4. uncontinuous reblogged this from queerical
  5. queerical reblogged this from moniquill
  6. bourgeoisboobear reblogged this from angrywocunited
  7. das-flugzeug reblogged this from angrywocunited
  8. imnotevilimjustwrittenthatway reblogged this from a-spoon-is-born
  9. voldiebuns reblogged this from broadlybrazen
  10. notthehelplesslittlegirl reblogged this from moneyinthebananastand
  11. fallingupbackwards reblogged this from narihira
  12. broadlybrazen reblogged this from angrywocunited
  13. catedrals reblogged this from ginnabean
  14. vampirefinch reblogged this from witchsistah
  15. catastrophecutie reblogged this from soybeanbaby
  16. moneyinthebananastand reblogged this from thelonehuman
  17. korras reblogged this from narihira
  18. jemeryl reblogged this from mygayshoes
  19. jinyinhua reblogged this from narihira
  20. captainbirogers reblogged this from angrywocunited
  21. konanbear reblogged this from blackfangirlsunite
  22. olucival reblogged this from a-spoon-is-born
  23. roamingreader reblogged this from nncharlesz
  24. verdanthandshake reblogged this from validcriticism
  25. validcriticism reblogged this from fanbingblink and added:
    You don’t require proof or a reason to include a white person, why do you demand one for the inclusion of poc? You...
  26. xniconicox reblogged this from miss-momo-tan
  27. h--alcy0n reblogged this from nonbinaryanders